Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 13, ISSUE 2, P277-293, May 2005

MR Imaging of Diffuse Liver Diseases

      It is the objective of all cross-sectional imaging techniques to have the ability to evaluate the anatomic configuration of normal and abnormal tissues. In addition, it has become increasingly evident that MR imaging can demonstrate normal and pathologic processes that represent tissue cellular and intracellular architecture, and intracellular processes. Using intravenously injected contrast agent can provide further information regarding the vessels that perfuse normal and abnormal tissues, in regards to the origin of the vessels, the number and size of vessels, and the integrity of the vessel walls. Although CT and ultrasound have some of the abilities that are found in MR imaging, the examples that are discussed in this article show applications of MR imaging of the liver that are uniquely suited to MR; the combination of different sequences that make up a routine MR examination are capable of elucidating important and common disease processes and MR is an evolving anatomic and molecular imaging tool with the capacity to allow realization of the aim to have techniques that represent noninvasive pathology assessment.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Brenner D.J.
        • Elliston C.D.
        Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full body CT screening.
        Radiology. 2004; 232: 735-738
        • Coates G.G.
        • Borrello J.A.
        • McFarland E.G.
        • et al.
        Hepatic T2-weighted MRI: a prospective comparison of sequences, including breath-hold, half-Fourier turbo spin echo (HASTE).
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998; 8: 642-649
        • Helmberger T.K.
        • Schroder J.
        • Holzknecht N.
        • et al.
        T2-weighted breathold imaging of the liver: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of fast spin echo and half Fourier single shot fast spin echo imaging.
        MAGMA. 1999; 9: 42-51
        • Semelka R.C.
        • Martin D.R.
        • Balci C.
        • et al.
        Focal liver lesions: comparison of dual- phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 13: 397-401
        • Martin D.R.
        • Semelka R.C.
        • Chung J.J.
        • et al.
        Sequential use of gadolinium chelate and mangafodipir trisodium for the assessment of focal liver lesions: initial observations.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 18: 955-963
        • Naganawa S.
        • Jenner G.
        • Cooper T.G.
        • et al.
        Rapid MR imaging of the liver: comparison of twelve techniques for single breath-hold whole volume acquisition.
        Radiat Med. 1994; 12: 255-261
        • Bradley W.G.
        Optimizing lesion contrast without using contrast agents.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 10: 442-449
        • Siewert B.
        • Muller M.F.
        • Foley M.
        • et al.
        Fast MR imaging of the liver: quantitative comparison of techniques.
        Radiology. 1994; 193: 37-42
        • Chien D.
        • Edelman R.R.
        Ultrafast imaging using gradient echoes.
        Magn Reson Q. 1991; 7: 31-56
        • Rofsky N.M.
        • Lee V.S.
        • Laub G.
        • et al.
        Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.
        Radiology. 1999; 212: 876-884
        • Semelka R.C.
        • Brown E.D.
        • Ascher S.M.
        • et al.
        Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance on T2- weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images.
        Radiology. 1994; 192: 401-406
        • Kelekis N.L.
        • Semelka R.C.
        • Worawattanakul S.
        • et al.
        Hepatocellular carcinoma in North America: a multiinstitutional study of appearance on T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and serial gadolinium- enhanced gradient-echo images.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170: 1005-1013
        • Low R.N.
        Current uses of gadolinium chelates for clinical magnetic resonance imaging examination of the liver.
        Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998; 9: 141-166
        • Reimer P.
        • Rummeny E.J.
        • Daldrup H.E.
        • et al.
        Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging.
        Eur Radiol. 1997; 7: 275-280
        • Thu H.D.
        • Mathieu D.
        • Thu N.T.
        • et al.
        Value of MR imaging in evaluating focal fatty infiltration of the liver: preliminary study.
        Radiographics. 1991; 11: 1003-1012
        • Rofsky N.M.
        • Weinreb J.C.
        • Ambrosino M.M.
        • et al.
        Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996; 20: 230-235
        • Kier R.
        • Mason B.J.
        Water-suppressed MR imaging of focal fatty infiltration of the liver.
        Radiology. 1997; 203: 575-577
        • Mitchell D.G.
        Chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging: applications in the abdomen and pelvis.
        Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1992; 4: 46-63
        • Siegelman E.S.
        • Mitchell D.G.
        • Semelka R.C.
        Abdominal iron deposition: metabolism, MR findings, and clinical importance.
        Radiology. 1996; 199: 13-22
        • Torres C.G.
        • Lundby B.
        • Sterud A.T.
        • et al.
        MnDPDP for MR imaging of the liver. Results from the European phase III studies.
        Acta Radiol. 1997; 38: 631-637
        • Semelka R.C.
        • Lee J.K.
        • Worawattanakul S.
        • et al.
        Sequential use of ferumoxide particles and gadolinium chelate for the evaluation of focal liver lesions on MRI.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998; 8: 670-674
        • Bulte J.W.
        • Miller G.F.
        • Vymazal J.
        • et al.
        Hepatic hemosiderosis in non-human primates: quantification of liver iron using different field strengths.
        Magn Reson Med. 1997; 37: 530-536
        • Ernst O.
        • Sergent G.
        • Bonvarlet P.
        • et al.
        Hepatic iron overload: diagnosis and quantification with MR imaging.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168: 1205-1208
        • Thomsen C.
        • Wiggers P.
        • Ring-Larsen H.
        • et al.
        Identification of patients with hereditary haemochromatosis by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic relaxation time measurements.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 1992; 10: 867-879
        • Mitchell D.G.
        Hepatic imaging: techniques and unique applications of magnetic resonance imaging.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 1993; 9: 84-112
        • Engelhardt R.
        • Langkowski J.H.
        • Fischer R.
        • et al.
        Liver iron quantification: studies in aqueous iron solutions, iron overloaded rats, and patients with hereditary hemochromatosis.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 1994; 12: 999-1007
        • Gandon Y.
        • Guyader D.
        • Heautot J.F.
        • et al.
        Hemochromatosis: diagnosis and quantification of liver iron with gradient-echo MR imaging.
        Radiology. 1994; 193: 533-538
        • Keevil S.F.
        • Alstead E.M.
        • Dolke G.
        • et al.
        Non-invasive assessment of diffuse liver disease by in vivo measurement of proton nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation times at 0.08 T.
        Br J Radiol. 1994; 67: 1083-1087
        • Bonetti M.G.
        • Castriota-Scanderbeg A.
        • Criconia G.M.
        • et al.
        Hepatic iron overload in thalassemic patients: proposal and validation of an MRI method of assessment.
        Pediatr Radiol. 1996; 26: 650-656
        • Ernst O.
        • Sergent G.
        • Bonvarlet P.
        • et al.
        Hepatic iron overload: diagnosis and quantification with MR imaging.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168: 1205-1208
        • Semelka R.C.
        • Chung J.J.
        • Hussain S.M.
        • et al.
        Chronic hepatitis: correlation of early patchy and late linear enhancement patterns on gadolinium-enhanced MR images with histopathology initial experience.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 13: 385-391
        • Gandon Y.
        • Olivie D.
        • Guyader D.
        Non-invasive assessment of hepatic iron stores by MRI.
        Lancet. 2004; 363: 357-362
        • Alustiza J.M.
        • Artetxe J.
        • Castiella A.
        MR quantification of hepatic iron concentration.
        Radiology. 2004; 230: 479-484
        • Matsui O.
        • Kadoya M.
        • Takashima T.
        • et al.
        Intrahepatic periportal abnormal intensity on MR images: an indication of various hepatobiliary diseases.
        Radiology. 1989; 171: 335-338
        • Marzola P.
        • Maggioni F.
        • Vicinanza E.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the hepatocyte-specific contrast agent gadobenate dimeglumine for MR imaging of acute hepatitis in a rat model.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997; 7: 147-152
        • Martin D.R.
        • Seibert D.
        • Yang M.
        • et al.
        Reversible heterogeneous arterial phase liver perfusion associated with transient acute hepatitis: findings on gadolinium-enhanced MRI.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20: 838-842
        • Semelka R.C.
        • Worawattanakul S.
        • Kelekis N.L.
        • et al.
        Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997; 7: 1040-1047
        • Kreft B.P.
        • Tanimoto A.
        • Baba Y.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of fatty liver with MR imaging.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992; 2: 463-471
        • Kier R.
        • Mason B.J.
        Water-suppressed MR imaging of focal fatty infiltration of the liver.
        Radiology. 1997; 203: 575-577
        • Rofsky N.M.
        • Weinreb J.C.
        • Ambrosino M.M.
        • et al.
        Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996; 20: 230-235
        • Kreft B.
        • Dombrowski F.
        • Block W.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of different models of experimentally induced livercirrhosis for MRI research with correlation to histopathologic findings.
        Invest Radiol. 1999; 34: 360-366
        • King L.J.
        • Scurr E.D.
        • Murugan N.
        • et al.
        Hepatobiliary and pancreatic manifestations of cystic fibrosis: MR imaging appearances.
        Radiographics. 2000; 20: 767-777
        • Koolpe H.A.
        • Koolpe L.
        Portal hypertension. angiographic and hemodynamic evaluation.
        Radiol Clin N Am. 1986; 24: 369-381
        • Noone T.C.
        • Semelka R.C.
        • Siegelman E.S.
        • et al.
        Budd-Chiari syndrome: spectrum of appearances of acute, subacute, and chronic disease with magnetic resonance imaging.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11: 44-50
        • Rooholamini S.A.
        • Au A.H.
        • Hansen G.C.
        • et al.
        Imaging of pregnancy-related complications.
        Radiographics. 1993; 13: 753-770
        • Zissin R.
        • Yaffe D.
        • Fejgin M.
        • et al.
        Hepatic infarction in preeclampsia as part of the HELLP syndrome: CT appearance.
        Abdom Imaging. 1999; 24: 594-596