Keywords
Key points
- •Bone marrow involvement is a myeloma-defining event, and the extent and pattern of myeloma infiltration impact treatment decisions following updated diagnostic criteria by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG).
- •Whole-body MR imaging is recognized as the gold standard for the imaging diagnosis of bone marrow involvement in myeloma.
- •Whole-body MR imaging is particularly recommended for the workup of patients with smoldering or asymptomatic myeloma or those with solitary plasmacytoma.
- •The IMWG classifies MR imaging bone involvement as greater than 1 focal lesion with a diameter greater than 5 mm.
Introduction
Cancer Research UK. Myeloma incidence statistics. Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/myeloma/incidence#heading-Three. Accessed March 19, 2018.
Definition and role of imaging in myeloma
- •Clonal bone marrow plasma cells greater than 10% or biopsy-proven bony or extramedullary plasmacytoma and any one or more of the following myeloma-defining events:
- •Evidence of end-organ damage
- ○Hypercalcemia
- ○Renal insufficiency
- ○Anemia
- ○Bone lesions
- ○
- •Any one or more of the following biomarkers of malignancy:
- ○Clonal bone marrow plasma cell percentage of 60% or greater
- ○Involved: uninvolved serum free light chain ratio of 100 or greater
- ○Greater than 1 focal lesions on MR imaging studies greater than 5 mm
- ○



The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Myeloma: diagnosis and management. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng35. Accessed March 19, 2018.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Myeloma: diagnosis and management. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng35. Accessed March 19, 2018.
International Myeloma Working Group Definitions of Myeloma Bone Involvement
- •CT: one or more osteolytic lesions (≥5 mm)aCare should be taken to avoid overinterpretation of equivocal or tiny lucencies seen only on CT or PET/CT. For equivocal lesions, a repeat study in 3 to 6 months should be done before a diagnosis of multiple myeloma is established. Such patients might be followed up closely at 1- to 3-month intervals before systemic therapy is started.aCare should be taken to avoid overinterpretation of equivocal or tiny lucencies seen only on CT or PET/CT. For equivocal lesions, a repeat study in 3 to 6 months should be done before a diagnosis of multiple myeloma is established. Such patients might be followed up closely at 1- to 3-month intervals before systemic therapy is started.
- •18F FDG PET/CT: one or more osteolytic lesions (≥5 mm); increased FDG uptake alone is not sufficient; evidence of osteolytic bone destruction is needed on the CT component of the studyaCare should be taken to avoid overinterpretation of equivocal or tiny lucencies seen only on CT or PET/CT. For equivocal lesions, a repeat study in 3 to 6 months should be done before a diagnosis of multiple myeloma is established. Such patients might be followed up closely at 1- to 3-month intervals before systemic therapy is started.
- •MR imaging: more than one focal lesion of a diameter greater than 5 mm; diffuse marrow abnormality does not qualifybIn cases of equivocal small lesions, a second MR imaging should be performed after 3 to 6 months; if the MR imaging shows progression, patients should be treated as having symptomatic myeloma.
- Moreau P.
- Attal M.
- Caillot D.
- et al.
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in myeloma


Whole-body MR imaging protocols

Sequence Description | Core Protocol | |
---|---|---|
1 | Whole spine: sagittal, T1W, TSE, 4- to 5-mm slice thickness | Yes |
2 | Whole spine: sagittal, T2, STIR or fat-suppressed T2W, 4- to 5-mm slice thickness | Yes |
3 |
| Axial (5 mm) |
4 |
| 2 b-values (b50–100 and b800–1000 s/mm2) |
5 | Whole-body (vertex to knees): axial, T2W, TSE without fat suppression, 5-mm contiguous slicing, multiple stations, preferably matching the DW images | Optional |
6 | Regional assessments, for example, symptomatic/known sites outside the standard field of view, axial T2W through sites of suspected cord compression, para-coronal T1 sacrum for suspected sacral nerve root involvement | Optional |
- Padhani A.R.
- Lecouvet F.E.
- Tunariu N.
- et al.
- Geith T.
- Schmidt G.
- Biffar A.
- et al.
Pearls, pitfalls, and variants
T2 Shine Through

Red Marrow

Hemangiomas

Trephine Tracts

Incidental Findings
Imaging response


Prognosis
- Moreau P.
- Attal M.
- Caillot D.
- et al.
What the referring physician needs to know
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Myeloma: diagnosis and management. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng35. Accessed March 19, 2018.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Myeloma: diagnosis and management. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng35. Accessed March 19, 2018.
Future directions and summary
References
Cancer Research UK. Myeloma incidence statistics. Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/myeloma/incidence#heading-Three. Accessed March 19, 2018.
- From myeloma precursor disease to multiple myeloma: new diagnostic concepts and opportunities for early intervention.Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17: 1243-1252
- Multiple myeloma: clinical review and diagnostic imaging.Radiology. 2004; 231: 11-23
- Osteoclasts control reactivation of dormant myeloma cells by remodelling the endosteal niche.Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 8983
- Signaling between tumor cells and the host bone marrow microenvironment.Calcif Tissue Int. 2014; 94: 125-139
- International myeloma working group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: e538-e548
- The radiological demonstration of osseous metastases. Experimental observations.Clin Radiol. 1967; 18: 158-162
- Magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of solitary plasmacytoma of bone.J Clin Oncol. 1993; 11: 1311-1315
- Staging monoclonal plasma cell disease: comparison of the Durie-Salmon and the Durie-Salmon PLUS staging systems.Radiology. 2010; 257: 195-204
- Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma.Eur Radiol. 2008; 18: 51-58
- Accuracy of whole-body low-dose multidetector CT (WBLDCT) versus skeletal survey in the detection of myelomatous lesions, and correlation of disease distribution with whole-body MRI (WBMRI).Skeletal Radiol. 2009; 38: 225-236
- Whole-body computed tomography versus conventional skeletal survey in patients with multiple myeloma: a study of the International Myeloma Working Group.Blood Cancer J. 2017; 7: e599
- International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma.Leukemia. 2009; 23: 1545-1556
- Whole-body MRI versus PET in assessment of multiple myeloma disease activity.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 980-986
- The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system.Eur J Cancer. 2006; 42: 1539-1543
- Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI: a new gold standard for assessing disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma?.Leukemia. 2016; 30: 1446-1448
- Low expression of hexokinase-2 is associated with false-negative FDG-positron emission tomography in multiple myeloma.Blood. 2017; 130: 30-34
- Application of (18)F-FDG PET and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in multiple myeloma: comparison of functional imaging modalities.Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 5: 479-492
- Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with multiple myeloma: a consensus statement.J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33: 657-664
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Myeloma: diagnosis and management. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng35. Accessed March 19, 2018.
- Whole body diffusion weighted MRI–a new view of myeloma.Br J Haematol. 2015; 171: 29-37
- Extensive bone marrow infiltration and abnormal free light chain ratio identifies patients with asymptomatic myeloma at high risk for progression to symptomatic disease.Leukemia. 2013; 27: 947-953
- Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma.N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 438-447
- Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma.J Clin Oncol. 1995; 13: 251-256
- Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma.Ann Oncol. 2005; 16: 1824-1828
- Prognostic value of vertebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with stage I multiple myeloma.Br J Haematol. 1999; 104: 723-729
- Clinical, genomic, and imaging predictors of myeloma progression from asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathies (SWOG S0120).Blood. 2014; 123: 78-85
- Diffusion-weighted imaging for non-invasive and quantitative monitoring of bone marrow infiltration in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease: a comparative study with histology.Br J Haematol. 2011; 153: 721-728
- Stage III multiple myeloma: clinical and prognostic value of spinal bone marrow MR imaging.Radiology. 1998; 209: 653-660
- Frequency, distribution and clinical management of incidental findings and extramedullary plasmacytomas in whole body diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple myeloma.Haematologica. 2016; 101: e142-e144
- Incidence of extramedullary disease in patients with multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapy, and the activity of pomalidomide on extramedullary myeloma.Leukemia. 2011; 25: 906-908
- Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography at diagnosis and before maintenance therapy in symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 trial: results of the IMAJEM Study.J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 2911-2918
- Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics.Radiology. 2002; 224: 177-183
- Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Magn Reson Med. 2000; 43: 828-836
- Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas.J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 9: 53-60
- Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 26: 682-687
- Inverse correlation between choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy signal intensity and the apparent diffusion coefficient in human glioma.Magn Reson Med. 1999; 41: 2-7
- Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92: 2029-2036
- Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its application to cancer.Cancer Imaging. 2006; 6: 135-143
- Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: application to experimental neuro-oncology.Q Magn Reson Biol Med. 1994; 1: 89-106
- Changes in water mobility measured by diffusion MRI predict response of metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy.Neoplasia. 2004; 6: 831-837
- Early response of prostate carcinoma xenografts to docetaxel chemotherapy monitored with diffusion MRI.Neoplasia. 2002; 4: 255-262
- The functional diffusion map: an imaging biomarker for the early prediction of cancer treatment outcome.Neoplasia. 2006; 8: 259-267
- Dynamic imaging of emerging resistance during cancer therapy.Cancer Res. 2006; 66: 4687-4692
- Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 13: 757-760
- Prognostic significance of focal lesions in whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma.J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 1606-1610
- Bone metastases from prostate, breast and multiple myeloma: differences in lesion conspicuity at short-tau inversion recovery and diffusion-weighted MRI.Br J Radiol. 2012; 85: 1102-1106
- Pre-treatment staging of multiple myeloma patients: comparison of whole-body diffusion weighted imaging with whole-body T1-weighted contrast-enhanced imaging.Acta Radiol. 2015; 56: 733-738
- The diagnostic value of SE MRI and DWI of the spine in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smouldering myeloma and multiple myeloma.Eur Radiol. 2014; 24: 2754-2765
- Optimising diffusion weighted MRI for imaging metastatic and myeloma bone disease and assessing reproducibility.Eur Radiol. 2011; 21: 1713-1718
- Assessing response of myeloma bone disease with diffusion-weighted MRI.Br J Radiol. 2012; 85: e1198-e1203
- Can whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging replace Tc 99m bone scanning and computed tomography for single-step detection of metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer?.Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 68-75
- Diagnostic value of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 34: 128-135
- Assessing myeloma bone disease with whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison with x-ray skeletal survey by region and relationship with laboratory estimates of disease burden.Clin Radiol. 2015; 70: 614-621
- Comparison of whole-body diffusion MRI and conventional radiological assessment in the staging of myeloma.Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013; 94: 629-636
- METastasis reporting and data system for prostate cancer: practical guidelines for acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of multiorgan involvement in advanced prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2017; 71: 81-92
- MR prediction of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996; 6: 667-674
- Differentiation of acute osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures of the spine: use of additive qualitative and quantitative axial diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T.Radiology. 2014; 271: 488-498
- Quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures with diffusion-weighted MRI: what is the optimum combination of b values for ADC-based lesion differentiation with the single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence?.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203: 582-588
- Comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and chemical-shift imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral body fractures.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199: 1083-1092
- Apparent diffusion coefficient of normal abdominal organs and bone marrow from whole-body DWI at 1.5 T: the effect of sex and age.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205: 242-250
- Apparent diffusion coefficient of vertebral haemangiomas allows differentiation from malignant focal deposits in whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI.Eur Radiol. 2018; 28: 1687-1691
- Assessing response in bone metastases in prostate cancer with diffusion weighted MRI.Eur Radiol. 2011; 21: 2169-2177
- Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging for assessment of treatment response in myeloma.Radiology. 2014; 271: 785-794
- Whole body magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: early changes in lesional signal fat fraction predict disease response.Br J Haematol. 2017; 176: 222-233
- F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.Blood. 2009; 114: 2068-2076
- Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation.Blood. 2011; 118: 5989-5995
- Changes in magnetic resonance imaging before and after autologous stem cell transplantation correlate with response and survival in multiple myeloma.Haematologica. 2012; 97: 1757-1760
Article info
Footnotes
Disclosure: The authors acknowledge National Health Service funding to the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Center, Clinical Research Facility in Imaging, and the Cancer Research Network. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy